Last updated: October 19, 2026
A funded $500,000 initiative covers six months of a four-person contract team, with a mid-level business analyst, two mid-level software engineers, and a mid-level project manager costing about $392,800 at national index medians. Drop one engineer and the team fits a $300,000 budget at $280,600. Every seat is billed hourly at 40 hours a week, using the KORE1 Contract Rate Index 2026-Q4, effective October 16, 2026.
Devin Hornick, a Partner at KORE1, framed the whole problem in two sentences. “Companies may not approve three or four permanent hires, but they may absolutely approve the resources or project team necessary to complete a $300K or $500K initiative that has already been funded.”
That’s the page. Staffing a project without adding headcount turns out to be arithmetic, mostly.
If you run a department that has money for a project and no approval for a req, you don’t need another argument about headcount. You need a number your CFO can sign. We sell contract labor, so weigh this accordingly. Our contract staffing team will still tell you when a project is small enough to absorb internally. Sometimes it is.

What Does a $300K or $500K Initiative Buy in Contract Hours?
A contract project team is a small group of W2 contractors billed hourly for the life of one funded initiative. At 40 hours a week for six months, each seat runs about 1,040 hours, and the cost is that seat’s bill rate times those hours, with payroll taxes and insurance already inside the rate.
Here are the five seats most software initiatives are built from, priced at national medians.
| Seat | Index cell | Bill median per hour | Six-month cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business analyst, mid-level | business-analyst | mid | united-states-national | $81 | $84,000 |
| Software engineer, mid-level | software-engineer | mid | united-states-national | $108 | $112,200 |
| Project manager, mid-level | project-manager | mid | united-states-national | $81 | $84,400 |
| Software engineer, senior | software-engineer | senior | united-states-national | $131 | $136,600 |
| Business systems analyst, mid-level | bsa | mid | united-states-national | $84 | $87,300 |
Stack those seats into teams and the two budgets fall out almost on their own.
| Team shape | Seats | Six-month total | Against the budget |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lean team (3,120 hours) | Business analyst, one engineer, project manager | $280,600 | $19,400 under $300,000 |
| Standard team (4,160 hours) | Business analyst, two engineers, project manager | $392,800 | $107,200 under $500,000 |
| Senior-led team (4,160 hours) | Business analyst, mid-level engineer, senior engineer, project manager | $417,200 | $82,800 under $500,000 |
| Five-seat team (5,200 hours) | Business systems analyst, business analyst, two engineers, project manager | $480,100 | $19,900 under $500,000 |
The blended rate on the standard team works out to about $94 an hour. Divide $500,000 by that and you get roughly 5,300 hours of work on the table, which is about two and a half years of full-time effort compressed into six months across four people.
Look at the $107,200 left over in the standard row. Most people spend it on one of two things. Either a senior engineer replaces a mid-level one, or a fifth seat arrives. Both together overshoot by about $4,500.
One opinion, flagged as opinion. The project manager seat is the first thing directors cut to make a number work, and it’s the one that gets quietly regretted around month three. Three people with no one tracking dependencies tend to build the wrong thing quickly.
Does Metro Change the Math?
It does. Mostly through the engineer seats, which carry the widest spread. Same role. Same level. Same 1,040 hours.
| Mid-level software engineer | Bill median per hour | Six-month cost | Lean team with this engineer | Standard team with two |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| San Francisco Bay Area | $143 | $148,200 | $316,600 | $464,800 |
| United States national | $108 | $112,200 | $280,600 | $392,800 |
| Dallas-Fort Worth, including Plano, Irving, and Frisco | $106 | $110,000 | $278,400 | $388,400 |
In the Bay Area, the lean team doesn’t fit $300,000 anymore. It lands at $316,600, over by $16,600. Only the engineers moved in that table, though. The analyst and the project manager keep their national rates there, and if all four seats sit in the Bay Area, the standard team costs $512,400. Over a $500,000 budget. Dallas-Fort Worth sits a little under the national line, so a Plano team gets a few thousand dollars back.
If you’re a director in Plano and your counterpart is in San Francisco, the two of you can be holding the same approved budget and staffing very different teams with it, which is worth knowing before a shared steering committee meeting turns into an argument.
What Breaks If the Project Doesn’t Finish?
Funded work that slides into 2027 costs more than the delay itself. A budget approved for this year doesn’t always survive a calendar flip, the vendor contract signed against the original go-live date can keep billing, and the people who scoped the thing have moved to the next fire by the time anyone reopens it. Teams restart cold.
Permanent hiring can’t rescue that timeline. A search that opens in late October, interviews through November, and lands a notice period in January delivers its first productive week after the budget conversation has already been had without you.
How Do You Frame It for the CFO When Permanent Reqs Are Frozen?
Stop asking for headcount. Ask for a project budget with an end date.
The difference sounds cosmetic. It isn’t. A req is an open-ended commitment that outlives the project that justified it. A contract team is a line item with a start, a finish, and a total you can write down. Finance teams approve the second kind all the time. Often from a budget that’s already been set aside.
A one-page ask gets further than a long deck. Keep it short. It needs, roughly, these:
- The budget line, by name.
- Seats, levels, and metro, with the table above attached so nobody has to trust your arithmetic.
- A hard end date, and a sentence on how an extension would be approved if the date slips.
- The name of the person on your side who manages the contractors day to day, because hourly contractors are managed by you.
There’s an accounting angle worth raising early, and I’d raise it as a question, not a claim. Devin put it this way on our internal content call. The contract, he said, “allows that company to write it off as a CapEx, if they’re working on a development project.” Whether your contractor spend capitalizes is a call for your controller and your auditors, not for a staffing firm.
The standard they’d be looking at is moving, though. The Financial Accounting Standards Board’s ASU 2025-06, issued in September 2025, drops the old project-stages model for internal-use software. Capitalization now starts once management has authorized and committed to funding the project and it’s probable the software will be completed and used as intended. It takes effect for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and early adoption is allowed. A funded initiative reads a lot like the first condition. Does it? Ask your controller.
Devin’s note to us also carried a question for hiring managers. “Where are you being asked to increase productivity without adding headcount?” Answer it in the memo. The places you name are the places the project team should be pointed at.

What Is Inside a Contract Bill Rate?
More than the contractor’s pay. Here’s the round-number version Devin uses, and it’s an illustration, not a KORE1 rate card.
Say a contractor is paid $100 an hour. Employer burden, which is the payroll taxes, required insurance, and similar costs that ride on every W2 hour, runs 24% in the KORE1 index, or $24. Loaded cost is now $124 before the staffing firm earns anything. A bill rate on that worker lands around $150 to $160.
Why spell it out? Because burden is the piece most often left out of a quoted markup. A firm that says its markup is a certain percentage might mean a percentage of pay, or a percentage of loaded cost, and those are different invoices by a wide margin. So ask which one. Ask before you compare quotes. The hourly bill rate in the index tables above already contains all of it, which is why we budget from bill rates and not from the pay a contractor sees on a job board.
What If the Project Runs Long?
You extend by the week. You pay for the hours worked. Contract engagements here are billed hourly on a time and materials basis, with no fixed fee. Devin put it plainly on the call: “Hourly, which we prefer. It’s really more of a staffing model to do the hourly billing and you manage the person.”
What does a slip cost? An extra week of the standard four-person team runs about $15,100. The lean team runs about $10,800 a week, which sounds small until you remember that a three-person team slipping a full month, because a vendor API wasn’t ready or a stakeholder changed the scope in week ten, adds roughly $43,000 to the bill.
Is six months even the right planning number? Not quite. The median ended IT assignment at KORE1 lasted 136 days, which is a little under 20 weeks (n=410, from our placement data). Plenty run longer. Plenty end sooner. Treat six months as a budget ceiling for a $300K to $500K initiative. Not a forecast. If the work finishes at day 136, the leftover budget stays yours.
How Do KORE1 Observed Rates Compare With the Modeled Medians?
Mixed, honestly. The index has two kinds of cells. Modeled cells start from federal wage data, add a 24% burden, and apply the bill-to-cost ranges we see on our own placements. Observed cells come straight from KORE1 W2 placements that started between 2023 and 2026, and they’re mostly Southern California.
| Role | Observed median (KORE1 placements, primarily Southern California) | Observed range, 25th to 75th percentile | Modeled national median, mid-level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineer, all levels (n=16) | $105 ($109,200 for six months) | $91 to $120 | $108 |
| Project manager, all levels (n=21) | $116 ($120,900 for six months) | $105 to $124 | $81 |
Engineers line up within three dollars. Project managers don’t. The observed PM median runs $35 an hour above the modeled national figure, and I’d rather show you that than hide it. Two things are true at once. The samples are small, since the observed cells hold only 16 and 21 placements, and a handful of contracts moves them. They also cover all levels in a mostly Southern California market, while the modeled cell is a national mid-level wage plus burden.
Which number to trust depends on where your seat sits, how senior the person needs to be, and whether the project manager is a scrum master running two-week sprints or a program lead coordinating three vendors and a steering committee, because those are very different hires that share a job title.
What it means for a budget in Orange County or Los Angeles is simple. Price the PM seat off the observed number until a quote tells you otherwise. Swap both observed cells into the standard team, keep the analyst national, and the total is $423,300, still comfortably inside $500,000. The lean team with the observed engineer and PM comes to $314,100, which no longer fits $300,000. That’s the kind of thing you want to find out in the planning stage.
What Happens to the Team When the Project Ends?

Two options. The contractors roll off, and you stop paying. Or you convert the ones you want to keep. Both are fine.
Here’s a coincidence that isn’t one. Six months at 40 hours a week is about 1,040 hours, and 1,040 hours is the point where a KORE1 contractor becomes eligible to convert to your payroll with no fee from us. A full six-month seat on the team above finishes right at the threshold.
Does anyone actually convert? Across all roles in our placement data, 207 of 552 contract-to-hire placements converted to direct hire, or 37.5%. Not most. Not rare either. If you suspect you’ll want someone to stay, say so to your recruiter around month four and not at the end.
Questions Directors Ask Before They Sign Off
So what does a $500K project budget buy in contractors?
Four mid-level people for six months, around $392,800 at national medians. That’s a business analyst, two software engineers, and a project manager, billed hourly at 40 hours a week.
The remaining $107,200 covers either a senior engineer in place of a mid-level one ($417,200 total) or a fifth seat, a business systems analyst ($480,100 total). Not both.
How much does staff augmentation cost for a development team?
$108 an hour for a mid-level software engineer at the national median, or about $112,200 over six months. The Bay Area runs $143 an hour ($148,200) and Dallas-Fort Worth $106 ($110,000).
A development team is more than its engineers, so add the analyst and project manager seats from the tables above. Our tech contractor hourly rates guide covers the wider role list.
Will finance treat a project team differently from a permanent hire?
Usually. The spend is tied to a funded project with an end date instead of an open-ended salary line. How it is classified in the books, operating or capital, is your controller’s decision.
Is the bill rate the whole hourly cost?
Almost. The bill rate already includes the contractor’s pay, the 24% employer burden, and the staffing firm’s margin. Overtime and any expenses you agree to would come on top.
Wrong deadline? What if we need another month?
Extend by the week. Billing is hourly, so cost follows hours worked, and an extra week of the standard four-person team runs about $15,100.
The median ended IT assignment at KORE1 lasted 136 days (n=410), so some projects finish well short of six months too. Our project staffing page explains how the hourly model works in practice.
Can we keep the people after launch?
After 1,040 hours, yes, with no conversion fee from KORE1. A seat that runs the full six months at 40 hours a week reaches that mark right at the end.
Price Your Team
Start with the table. Send us roles, levels, metro, start date, length, and the budget you’re working against, and we’ll price the full team against the index and tell you where each seat should land. Get a bill rate quote for your team. If the freeze is the harder problem, our notes on contract staffing during a hiring freeze and the blended workforce model go further into the budget conversation, and the year-end budget piece covers spending a budget that expires in December.
Data: KORE1 Contract Rate Index 2026-Q4, effective October 16, 2026. Observed cells come from KORE1 W2 placements with 2023 to 2026 starts, primarily Southern California, with n shown per cell. Modeled cells use BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics May 2025 estimates, released May 15, 2026, at a 24% employer burden. Median IT assignment length is from KORE1 ended assignments (n=410). Method details are in how the Contract Rate Index is built. Review date for this page is January 2027, when the index refreshes.

